Tech Trend 247

There are tons of rumors about a new MacBook Pro headed to stores sometime this fall. The laptop is rumored to have OLED keycaps (replacing the function keys), numerous USB-C ports and a thinner, more tapered design that looks a bit more like the MacBook.

But what of the MacBook Air, Apple’s longstanding entry-level notebook? The MacBook Air hasn’t had a major upgrade since early 2015 (the RAM was upgraded to 8GB across models in early 2016) and its still sporting the same physical design dating back to 2010.

Last month, there was a rumor of a minor MacBook Air refresh, but that didn’t end up panning out. Moreover, since the introduction of the MacBook last year – plenty of pundits have predicted that the MacBook Air will probably never get a major refresh again.

Now, this doesn’t mean that the MacBook Air is going away. It’s still a great laptop – and a total workhorse – but if you look at Apple’s product line, the MacBook now occupies the place the MacBook Air once took (the most portable, lightest, thinnest notebook) and the MacBook Pro has become thinner over time in a way that sort of obviates the need for a laptop that is simply “thin.”

Still, given its low starting price of $899, I expect the MacBook Air to continue to be sold.

Apple's lingering products

Apple has a history of keeping old products for sale for years after they last received hardware updates. In fact, it was just last month that the non-retina unibody MacBook Pro 13-inch finally left store shelves. That product hadn’t had a hardware update since mid–2012.

So it stands to reason that as long as the MacBook Air still sells, Apple will continue to offer it. Who knows, maybe the company will even consider lowering the price.

Now, the age of the components (no Skylake for you!) might turn some budget-conscious buyers away, but anyone who has used a 2015 MacBook Air can attest to the fact that it is a very good machine. I frequently use a 2014 MacBook Air and rarely run into performance bottle necks. And I say that as someone whose daily driver tends to be a 15-inch MacBook Pro.

Plus, until the price of the MacBook comes down – the MacBook Air really is a solid entry-level Mac. It doesn’t have the retina display of its peers but it's a good performer with terrific battery life and super-fast SSD storage. Plus it has tons of ports (USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 2, SD card slots).

Do we still need a MacBook Air?

When I reviewed the redesigned MacBook back in 2015 (and the updated version in 2016), I commented that it represented the future of computing.

In fact, I said that I expected every laptop in the next five years to resemble the MacBook – the same way the MacBook Air continues to influence laptop designs today.

But given the price point of the MacBook (it starts at $1299) and its single USB-C port, I don’t think that product is quite ready to replace the MacBook Air. The MacBook is a great secondary computer for business users – and I think it’s a great choice for many students – but for the money, the MacBook Pro is a better value.

The new MacBook Air is the iPad Pro

Interestingly, the new successor to the MacBook Air might just be the iPad Pro.

After all – that is the device Apple CEO Tim Cook seems to be targeting against the Chromebook. And although a fully-outfitted 12.9-inch iPad Pro with keyboard and Apple Pencil will actually cost more than a MacBook Air, the iPad Pro is an interesting take on the future of computing.

Plenty of apps on the iPad are remarkably full featured and the time when you couldn’t do real work on an iPad has long since passed. Plenty of professionals use the iPad Pro as their primary machine.

We still need an entry-level Apple device, and that’s long been the MacBook Air. But if the MacBook Air isn’t going to get a significant update, the iPad Pro might be better for lots of users.

While I fully expect to see a fully-refreshed MacBook Pro this fall, I don’t think we’ll be seeing a major MacBook Air update again.

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.

The second iteration of Apple's 12-inch Retina MacBook brought very little in terms of design changes, although with a new processor and speedier memory, it does offer a significant performance upgrade. 

The biggest change, though? The addition of a rose gold model, making it the first-ever MacBook to be available in pink(ish). Does it matter, then, how the new MacBook looks from the inside? The answer is yes, yes it does. 

The tinkerers at iFixit have disassembled a rose gold MacBook Monday, posting photographic proof each step of the way. And while it's hardly a surprise that the device's rose gold finish is visible on the inside as well as the outside, it's still cool to see (if you're a in the camp that likes the rose gold color). 

Other than that, there are no many surprises in this teardown. The MacBook is still painfully hard to repair, though, thankfully, it shares a lot of parts with the last year's model. 

Check out the full teardown over at iFixit. 

It’s funny, and a little humbling, to realize you’ve been doing it wrong.

I mean, all this time, I was comparing the Surface Pro 4 to Apple’s giant iPad Pro. It made intuitive sense. Both have touch screens, both have detachable keyboards. Both are super thin and light. Both have multi-tasking. But I made a fundamental error. Only one of these systems runs a X86 CPU and offers a file system. One of them, the Surface Pro 4, is a personal computer and one is a powerful mobile system reaching to be the same.

When I got my hands on the latest MacBook, a follow-up to the ultra-light single-input-port MacBook launched a year ago, I realized I’d made a mistake. With its new Intel 6th Generation Core CPU, size (12-inches), weight (2 lbs.), keyboard and touchpad configuration, it’s the actually the best counter to Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4.

Honestly, if you’re shopping for an ultra-portable computer, with laptop chops, a desktop OS, applications and all-day battery life, these are probably the two systems you want to consider. And it won’t be an easy choice. Leaving aside the obvious differences in operating systems (which aren’t as big as you think), these two systems compare quite favorably.

To help you decide and for my own personal entertainment, I’ve decided to do a feature-by-feature comparison, focusing in on areas that I think impact ultraportable use the most. I will also try to choose a winner in each category.

This should be fun.

Size

The MacBook and Microsoft Surface are surprisingly close in size: The Surface Pro is almost a half-inch wider and the difference along the short edge is just under a quarter of an inch. The depth of the two systems is a little harder to compare. For the sake of parity, I looked at the Surface Pro 4 with the Type Cover attached (when on-the-go, I rarely – if ever – use it without it). Even so, Because the MacBook’s thickness varies so widely from edge to edge, it’s tough to compare.

Without a doubt, the MacBook is, at its thinnest edge (.14 inches), way thinner than the Surface Pro 4. However, at the MacBook’s thickest edge, which measures a little over a half an inch, the two systems are virtually equal.

Since the differences in size are fairly minimal, I have to focus a bit on feel. With its aluminum chassis and smooth curves the MacBook is a pleasure to hold. The Surface Pro 4, by contrast, feels solid and pleasant, but its magnesium body is all corners and flat edges. I like the look of both, but if I close my eyes, the MacBook just feels better.

Score one for the MacBook.

Weight

As I said, in order to make this a fair fight, I have to compare the MacBook to the Surface Pro 4 with the Type Cover attached. Without that keyboard, the Surface Pro 4 running a Core i5 CPU weighs 1.73 lbs. (with the baseline Core m3, it weighs 1.69 lbs.). When you add the Type Cover, the total weight is 2.28 lbs.

The MacBook, regardless of CPU configuration (it only comes with Intel Core m-class), weighs a flat two pounds. You’d be surprised, but that quarter of a pound is noticeable. This is partly because, while most of the weight on the Surface Pro 4 sits, naturally, in the tablet, the MacBook gets to spread it (meaning all the components) out more evenly between the keyboard and display. As a result, it’s more comfortable to carry an open MacBook than it is a Surface Pro.

Score one for the MacBook.

Lapability

Microsoft coined the word, but it’s a key aspect of any ultraportable: How well does it work in your lap?

Apple’s MacBook has a traditional laptop look, but I am impressed with how balanced it feels when sitting open in my lap. What it lacks, though is the Surface Pro 4’s adjustability, which comes from the integrated kickstand. So while the MacBook can open to a roughly 135-degree angle, the Surface Pro 4 can tip back to virtually any angle.

Score one for the Surface Pro 4.

Screen

At 12.3 inches diagonally, Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4 is slightly larger than the MacBook’s Retina display. Plus, even though Microsoft doesn’t call the display “Retina,” its screen actually has a higher resolution. The Surface Pro 4 comes in at 2736 x 1824, while the MacBook, which has the exact same screen as last year, is 2304 x 1440 pixels. That translates into a 41 pixels per inch difference, which may sound like a lot, but I defy anyone to eyeball the difference.

However, the Surface Pro 4 has something the MacBook doesn’t: a touch screen. Apple will tell you that’s not necessary when you have a trackpad, but the Surface Pro 4 with the Type Cover has one, as well. Personally, I find myself using both and anytime I switch to the MacBook, I have to stop myself from trying to use the Retina Display as a touch screen.

Aside from gestures, the Surface Pro 4’s display lets me draw on it. Obviously, if I want to draw on an Apple product, I should buy an iPad, but that’s not the point. This is a full-blown, no compromises PC, that also happens to have a very adept touch screen. Apple knows touch-displays. They could introduce a MacBook Touch. It would be an amazing ultraportable.

Score one for the Surface Pro 4.

Keyboard

There are some striking similarities between the MacBook keyboard and the ones the one found in the Type Cover for the Surface Pro 4. They are virtually the same size. Neither one feels cramped and both Microsoft and Apple managed to leave ample space between the keys. And yet the Type Cover offers the better typing experience and this is mostly due to travel, which is another way of saying “how much the key moves when you type on it.”

Apple did its best to invent a new way for keyboard keys to move up and down — they had to because there’s so little space under the keyboard (the batteries for the system are spread throughput the base). Typing on the MacBook keyboard feels fine, even satisfying, but pales in comparison to the feeling you get when you type on a Type Cover. The travel is at least double what you get with MacBook keys.

There’s also the fact that the Type Cover can fold all the way to the back of the Surface Pro 4 and it can detach completely from the tablet.

Score one for the Surface Pro 4.

Touch Pad

Apple’s MacBook Trackpad is noticeably larger and more elegant looking that the Type Cover’s touchpad. That extra space, in particular, comes in handy for gestures and overall usability.

I often wish the Type Cover’s trackpad was a little larger because I have a habit of placing my finger on the wrong spot, thinking I’m touching the right-click when I’m actually too far to the left. That doesn’t happen on the MacBook’s larger Trackpad.

On the other hand, the MacBook’s Trackpad suffers from the same issue as the keyboard: not enough travel. Compared to the touchpad on the Type Cover, the Trackpad feels stiff and almost unmoving. It takes some getting used to.

Both touchpads could use some improvement.

Tie.

Ports

Apple has gotten considerable flack for equipping the MacBook with just one port and, worse yet, one that almost nobody uses yet. The company did not change course with the new MacBook, but did at least come up with a whole collection of adapters that will help extend the MacBook’s USB-C port.

The Surface Pro 4 isn’t exactly bursting with ports, either. Instead of USB-C, the Surface Pro 4 has a single USB 3 port. Most of the time, this one port is enough for me. I use it mostly to import photos via a USB-based SD card reader. Sometimes, when I travel, I use to connect to an Ethernet adapter. If I need to import photos, I have to swap out the Ethernet. The Surface Pro 4 also adds a separate charging port, a Mini Display Port, which I never use because I usually dock the Surface Pro 4 in the office, and a micro SD card slot for storage expansion.

I do think Apple should have included one standard USB port on the MacBook, but when I think about how rarely I use the port on my Surface Pro 4, I wonder if I’m being fair.

Microsoft wins by a nose, but Apple gets props for leaning way forward.

Cameras

Microsoft’s Surface Pro is, compared to the MacBook, loaded with cameras. There’s an 8MP camera on the back, a 5 MP camera on the front and even an infrared camera (for Windows Hello face recognition log-in). Both standard cameras also shoot 1080p video.

Other than in a review situation, I never shoot video with the Surface Pro 4. This is important when you consider the MacBook’s paltry camera specs: a 480p FaceTime camera.

So, sure, that FaceTime camera is a disappointment, especially when you consider that the iPhone 6s’ FaceTime camera can shoot 720p, but I wouldn’t get too torn up about the overall lack of cameras on the MacBook.

The one area where it will impact your experience is on FaceTime (on the MacBook, only) and Skype.

I Skype a lot with my Surface Pro 4 and the video looks pretty good. Skyping and FaceTiming with a 480p camera is a little too 2006 for my tastes.

Score one for the Surface Pro 4.

CPUs, Performance and Battery Life

One of the reasons I finally decided to compare the Microsoft Surface Pro 4 and MacBook is because they are finally both running 6th generation Intel CPUs. Base systems both start with Core m3, which is part of Intel’s low-power-consumption, fan-less CPU line. The MacBook I’ve been testing came equipped with the mid-tier Core m5. The Surface Pro 4’s mid-tier is actually a leap to the Core i5, a desktop-class CPU.

If you think that I’ve gone way into the unfair comparison territory, consider this. A Surface Pro 4 running a Core i5 CPU and with the Type Cover keyboard, 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage costs $1428.99. A MacBook like the one I have – Core m5, 8GB of RAM and 512 GB of storage — costs $1,599.

Even so, direct comparisons on the power front are impossible. I would note, though, that the Core i5 running Surface Pro 4 is louder, because the desktop CPU requires a fan. In addition, there is no comparison on battery life. The MacBook’s Core m5 is simply more efficient and I get many more hours of work time.

Score one for the MacBook (with a caveat. Core m CPUs have their limits).

If you’re keeping count, the Microsoft Surface Pro 4 won this ultra-portable battle, but in a recent Facebook Live portability test (performed by yours truly and Senior Tech Analyst Christina Warren), the MacBook got online faster and fit inside a tight backpack just a little bit more easily. On the other hand, the Surface Pro 4 connected to an external monitor and keyboard at lot faster than the MacBook.

That competition was too silly to be conclusive, but between it and my own assessment above, perhaps you’ll finally be able to choose which one, the Apple MacBook or Microsoft Surface pro 4, is right for you.